Monday, March 9, 2009

The Budget Debate…

Many years ago – while my oldest was still in Jefferson School – the budget was up for vote – and failed (the first of many times over the coming years). One of the line items to go was late buses. I remember at the time thinking – “What’s the big deal?”. Then as my children got older I realized what a big deal it was. I was lucky – I had a job with flexible hours and was home from work by 3 – so I could pick my children up after an activity. But my heart broke for the many children who were not able to participate in an extra-curricular activity because they had no way to get home without the late buses. At a board meeting only recently, Haley Dix, the student council representative on the Board, voiced the concerns the High School students still have over the loss of the late buses – the program would not ever be restored, even though the children themselves were begging for it. Extra curricular activities aren’t just for fun – they are proof to a college a student is well rounded. They are the hammer that breaks down the wall between different social groups – a common interest with another student you wouldn’t normally socialize with. They are a method to help the shy child meet new friends. They are what helps our children grow up to be tolerant adults – to see that you may have things in common with someone you would never expect to. And in one day we as a community stopped the program forever without even realizing that would be the result.

I don’t think many realize the effects of a failed budget. The major line items on the budget are probably not going to change if the budget fails. The teachers will not be penalized with a cut in pay. The maintenance on all of the buildings will not go away. Who are the losers of a failed budget? The children of the district. For every failed budget, programs, like late buses, are cut, and those programs will never make their way back into the budget again – they are gone forever. So many parents turned up for the meeting 2 weeks ago where there was to be a vote on cancelling some courtesy busing. Are those of you that were there ready to pass the budget? Because if not, ALL courtesy busing could end up being cancelled. That means elementary aged children could be walking up to 2 miles, High School students up to 2.5 miles (these are the state guidelines for courtesy busing). The problem is we don’t know what will be cut in order to bring the budget down if it fails. It could be busing. It could be new books that are desperately needed for a class. It could be an entire Honors program. It could be an entire Special Education program. And if that program was cut, given the state caps on budget increases, it would be very unusual to ever see it again.

So – we as a community NEED to pass the budget. Every failed budget tells the students they aren’t at the top of our priority list. It tells new home buyers we aren’t interested in our schools or the programs it provides. As homeowners, as a community, it is our job, and our responsibility, to educate our children.

16 comments:

  1. Is it possible to get a subscription late bus? Parents could pay annually for the service.

    Aren't there about 1600 kids at the high school? If 20% stay for after school activities, that's over 300 cars on the road to pick them up. If a third of those carpool, you still have 200 cars on the road to pickup 200 kids. Isn't that a tremendous waste parents time and commuters time (because now you have 200 parents clogging the road when people are trying to get home from work)? Not to mention the pollution and waste of natural resources, and wear and tear on the roads, etc. It sounds like the bizarro world to trade 5-6 late buses for 200 cars. Less cars on the road benefits everybody by reducing traffic, pollution, potential accidents, not to mention giving kids something to productive to do with their time.

    I see the lack of late bus has moved you greatly. Do you have any suggestions on how to repair this omission?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's a great idea - I wonder if it was ever considered before. Thinking outside of the box to come up with ways to meet the needs of the children without costing additional money is exactly what I think we have lacked in recent years.

    What moved me so much was not the lack of late buses - it was the tone of Haley's voice asking for something that the kids themselves feel is lacking in the district. We teach our children to be independent and to be contributing members of society - so when they come up with something that they think would benefit them I think we should at least make an effort to think of something. Your idea is a great way to meet their needs without effecting the budget - I love it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I do agree 100% that cancelling the late buses was unfortunate and a shame. I also agree that it makes sense to keep 200 cars off the road during rush hour and wasting parents time/ I don't see how that would benefit the budget. The BOE isn't paying for the parents gas or time, is it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's what happens when a budget fails. Things get cut. That is why it is so urgent that as a community we pass the budget every year.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Even budgets that are an increase of 6% over last years budget? Should we always vote for budgets even if the spending does not go toward education?

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is an excellent question. If someone could explain why we need to spend more than last year, and make us feel good about it, the budget would pass.

    Was the removal of late buses broadcast as the outcome of the failed budget years ago?

    The problem is that we don't know what will be cut until the budget fails. No wonder people vote no. It is the starve the beast mentality.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another problem that is rampant today is the what I call the "I got mine mentality." What does the BOE care if they cut late buses? They close a window, they should open a door. Maybe not be in charge of an alternate late bus remedy, but at least get the PTA lined up to meet with the contracted bus company we hire for a separate private late bus deal.

    When they cut the late buses, they as much said, "Too bad, so sad." All you parents go re-invent the wheel.

    The BOE had access to the names and addresses of the students who used the late bus, it should have been transitioned to a private pay system, immediately. But the BOE didn't care, they cut their budget, and probably had car service for their kids, or didn't have kids. That was one heartless cut.

    Everyone should be concerned with educating children, if only for the selfish reason that they grow up and pay taxes, and don't burden society by entering the prison system.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There's a good slogan for Annette.

    Vote for the budget so your kids don't end up in prison.

    Get a life

    ReplyDelete
  9. The last time the budget was defeated in 2007, we lost 55 teachers/aides/staff (listing of those lost in the BOE minutes). This brought us to places like we are today - I believe I heard someone recently say there were 28 kids in the 5th grade classes at L/R. Failing the budget doesn't change the raises the teachers received and doesn't punish them - it takes something else away from the kids.

    As far as the BOE not caring - I agree with that statement which is why I am running. I don't think all on the current BOE are uncaring, but I think some are too complacent.

    In reference to cutting the late buses - as much as I disagree with it, when the budget failed, something had to go. Again - priorities. If there has to be a cut, it has to come from areas other than education first - we are in the business of education. In the same way I would choose keeping teachers and programs over the extra administrator, I would also keep teachers and programs over late buses.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can the new adminstrator's position be eliminated? Or, does he have a contract?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dr Heinegg ($135,000) & Dr McGann ($125,000) were approved in a meeting in Oct 2008 to replace Ed Hade ($159,000). Although I cannot state as fact since I have never been able to find a copy of the contract, since Mr Hade was a contracted position I assume these two are as well.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Do you think that was a wise decision? Do you think that 2 people and an extra $100,000.00 was necessary to replace one person? I believe that it was a very poor decision, especially in the midst of contract talks when the BOE had no idea of the costs that would be incurred in the end. Do you agree?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Annette, you stated that you have never been able to find a copy of the contract, do you mean the contracts for Drs. Heinegg and McGann? If so, wouldn't they be public record and what were you told when you asked?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have never asked to see their contract. I do not think it was a wise decision, and stated as much in a Board of Ed meeting not too long ago. Adding $100,000 position if we had money to spare would be fine - but at this point I think the goal should be to keep costs down BUT at the same time be sure we are providing the children with the education they need. As I stated in the meeting, I think if taxpayers/parents were given the choice between the $100,000 being spent on the Administrative position or spending that $100,000 to continue with busing as it has been (the motion that has now been tabled), that most would have chosen busing.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dear Annette,
    Congrats on your election. I look forward to FINALLY hearing your opinion on something.

    Good Luck.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Once again "Anonymous" - you're an ass.

    ReplyDelete